Most economists agree stimulus package is good except a lot of them

Of course some stories like this would have been more helpful two weeks ago but of course that's the point. The media stays silent until it passes and then they raise all sorts of questions so they can cover their asses;
Will the stimulus actually stimulate? Economists say no

By Kevin G. Hall | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The compromise economic stimulus plan agreed to by negotiators from the House of Representatives and the Senate is short on incentives to get consumers spending again and long on social goals that won't stimulate economic activity, according to a range of respected economists.

"I think (doing) nothing would have been better," said Ed Yardeni, an investment analyst who's usually an optimist, in an interview with McClatchy. He argued that the plan fails to provide the right incentives to spur spending.

"It's unfocused. That is my problem. It is a lot of money for a lot of nickel-and- dime programs. I would have rather had a lot of money for (promoting purchase of) housing and autos . . . . Most of this plan is really, I think, aimed at stabilizing the situation and helping people get through the recession, rather than getting us out of the recession. They are actually providing less short-term stimulus by cutting back, from what I understand, some of the tax credits."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No one spoke to Blago, except Rahmbo multiple times...

Obama spokesperson confirms NY Post article

What a load of crap!